Search
  • Dima Syrotkin

Research Says Solo Founders Perform Better. Here is Why.


Better to be a Han Solo in startups? Credit: deviantart.com/dzikawa

A recent study suggests that:


"Solo founders are more than twice as likely to own an ongoing, for-profit venture than two or more founders".

Or to put it in other words, ventures with solo founders are twice as likely to be profitable than ventures with 2 or more founders. See the graph below.



How can that be true? And what could be the dangers of being a solopreneur that founders should watch out for? Let us explore!



Why solo is better


As much as it may feel scary to go alone, there are good reasons to consider building a business alone, especially if you are spending a lot of time finding a co-founder.


Reason #1: Speed


As the famous African proverb goes, “If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, go together.” Solo founders move faster since they don't need to worry about the team alignment on every decision. And being fast can be argued to be the biggest advantage for a startup.


Reason #2: Founder disagreements


Top 3 reasons why startups fail is the founder team in-fighting. Sounds wrong to say this, but no co-founders - no problems.


Reason #3: Lower costs


It seems like there is no big difference between one person on the team and three, but at the early stage, even small differences matter a lot. Whether you need an office, and how many salaries you need to pay are all crucial questions at the start.


Reason #4: Taking risks


Founding a startup is a big risk. Three people who've already sacrificed quite a bit tend to be more risk-averse and the chances of someone choosing the safer path are higher.



The dangers of going solo


We will be honest - going solo is not for everyone. Consider the following dangers:


Danger #1: Funding


It's the sad truth that due to Y Combinator and Paul Graham's gospel, the Zeitgeist of our times is that being a solo founder means that you just couldn't convince your friends to join and therefore can't be trusted. Solo founders tend to receive considerably less funding, yet it could also play to their advantage, allow them to grow more organically and make fewer stupid mistakes.


Danger #2: Lack of support


Loneliness and depression hit entrepreneurs harder and solo founders harder still. Solo founders might also miss on diverse perspectives. I would advise solo founders to get something called a hands-on advisor or joining a supportive community of solo founders like GrowthClub. Both of those options are described in my previous article.



In sum


Solopreneurs move faster, avoid the drama of teams falling apart, reduce costs by default, and have an easier time taking risks. That being said, they should be aware of fewer funding opportunities and build their own support system.


Thanks for sticking till the end! I am a hands-on advisor at GrowthClub. GrowthClub is a community of founders with $5K+ MRR where founders exchange growth hacks and build genuine connections in 1-on-1 video calls.


I started with GrowthClub as a user. I liked it so much that I ended up helping the founder. Currently, after experiencing a great inflow of founders from our launch on Product Hunt and Indie Hackers featured article, we are signing up 30 hand-picked founders to form the core of our platform to actively iterate the product with them.




12,303 views

Subscribe to updates

Ask Us Anything

©2020 | Proudly created in Helsinki, Finland

dnetworklogo.png